تعهد نامه
مجله پژوهش در بهداشت محیط

مجله پژوهش در بهداشت محیط

بررسی کارایی فرآیند ازن‌زنی فتوکاتالیزوری در حضور نانو ذرات پارامغناطیسFe3O4@Alg-ZnO MNPS در حذف اسید اورانژ 7 از محیط‌های آبی

نوع مقاله : Research Paper

نویسندگان
ُساناز همتی فارسانی 1
حسن رحمانی 2
محمد باقر میران زاده 2
غلامرضا حسین دوست 2
فاطمه عطوف 3
کوروش رحمانی 4
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی مهندسی بهداشت محیط، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان، کاشان، ایران.
2 گروه مهندسی بهداشت محیط، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان، کاشان، ایران
3 گروه آمار زیستی و اپیدمیولوژی، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان، کاشان، ایران.
4 گروه مهندسی بهداشت محیط، مجتمع آموزش عالی سلامت ممسنی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شیراز، شیراز ، ایران.
10.22038/jreh.2025.25642
چکیده
زمینه و هدف: بسیاری از رنگ‌ها دارای اثرات سرطان‌زایی بوده و در بسیاری از موارد باعث بروز جهش‌های ژنتیکی در موجودات زنده می‌گردند. هم‌چنین، ترکیبات رنگی در مقابل فرایندهای تجزیه بیولوژیکی مقاوم می‌باشند و با روش‌های متداول قابل حذف نیستند. روش‌های مختلفی برای کاهش ورود فاضلاب‌های رنگی به آب‌های سطحی استفاده می‌شود. هدف از این تحقیق حذف اسید اورانژ 7  از محیط‌های آبی با استفاده از فرایند تلفیقیUV/Alg@Fe3O4_ZnO/O3 می‌باشد.

مواد و روش‌ها: این مطالعه در مقیاس آزمایشگاهی انجام شد. برای انجام آزمایش‌ها از یک راکتور به حجم 300 میلی‌لیتر، لامپ UVA و نانوذرات اکسیدروی (ZnO) ترکیب‌شده با اکسیدآهن (Fe3O4) بر پایه‌ی آلژینات استفاده شد. برای بررسی ویژگی‌های ساختاری این نانوکامپوزیت از آنالیزهای XRD , VSM , FTIR استفاده گردید. تاثیر پارامترهای غلظت اولیه کاتالیزور (0/15، 0/2، 0/1 گرم در لیتر)، غلظت اولیه آلاینده ( 300 ،200 ، 100 میلی گرم در لیتر)، زمان تماس (60 ،40 ،20 دقیقه) و pH (11، 7، 3) بر مقدار تجزیه اسید اورانژ 7 بررسی شد.

یافته ها: در این مطالعه، بازده حذف اسیداورانژ 7 در شرایط بهینه‌ی غلظت کاتالیست 2/0 گرم در لیتر، غلظت اولیه اسیداورانژ 7 (100 میلی گرم در لیتر)، زمان تماس 40 دقیقه و 7=pH به میزان 97 درصد حاصل گردید. نتایج مشخص کرد که پارامترهای زمان تماس و غلظت اولیه کاتالیزور و pH با بازده حذف اسید اورانژ 7 رابطه مستقیم و پارامتر غلظت اولیه آلاینده رابطه عکس دارد.

نتیجه گیری: تجزیه فتوکاتالیستی اسیداورانژ 7 به وسیله ی فرآیند تلفیقی UV/Alg@Fe3O4_ZnO/O3 یک روش مؤثر در حذف این آلاینده از محلول های آبی می‌باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اسیداورانژ
فرایند فتوکاتالیزوری
نانوذرات پارامغناطیس

عنوان مقاله English

The Investigation of the Catalytic Ozonation Process Using Fe₃O₄@Alg-ZnO Paramagnetic Nanoparticles for the Removal of Acid Orange 7 from Aqueous Solutions

نویسندگان English

Sanaz Hemmati Farsani 1
Hasan Rahmani 2
Mohammad Bagher Miranzadeh 2
Gholamreza Hossein Doost 2
Fatemeh Atoof 3
Korosh Rahmani 4
1 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
2 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
4 Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Mamasani Higher Education Complex for Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده English

Background and Purpose: Acidic dyes, such as Acid Orange 7, pose significant environmental and health risks due to their carcinogenic and mutagenic properties. These pollutants resist biological degradation, remaining persistent in conventional wastewater treatments. This study evaluates the removal of Acid Orange 7 using a combined UV/Alg@Fe₃O₄-ZnO/O₃ process.

Materials and Methods: A 300 mL laboratory-scale reactor was used with a UVA lamp and Fe₃O₄-ZnO nanoparticles synthesized on alginate. Structural characteristics of the nanocomposite were analyzed using XRD, VSM, and FTIR. Catalyst concentration (0.1, 0.2, and 0.5 g/L), pollutant concentration (100, 200, and 300 mg/L), reaction time (20, 40, and 60 minutes), and pH levels (3, 7, and 11) were evaluated for their impact on degradation efficiency.

Results: Optimal removal efficiency of 97% was achieved with 0.2 g/L catalyst concentration, 100 mg/L pollutant concentration, 40 minutes of reaction time, and a neutral pH. Removal efficiency increased with higher catalyst concentrations, longer reaction times, and neutral-to-alkaline pH but decreased with increasing pollutant concentrations.

Conclusion: The UV/Alg@Fe₃O₄-ZnO/O₃ process effectively degrades Acid Orange 7 in aqueous solutions, demonstrating high efficiency and potential for dye wastewater treatment.
 
Open Access Policy: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Acid Orange
Photocatalytic Process
Paramagnetic Nanoparticles
  1. Shindhal T, Rakholiya P, Varjani S, Pandey A, Ngo HH, Guo W, et al. A critical review on advances in the practices and perspectives for the treatment of dye industry wastewater. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):70-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2020.1863034 PMid:33356799 PMCid:PMC8806354
  2. Karri RR, Ravindran G, Dehghani MH. Chapter 1 - Wastewater-Sources, Toxicity, and Their Consequences to Human Health. In: Karri RR, Ravindran G, Dehghani MH, editors. Soft Computing Techniques in Solid Waste and Wastewater Management: Elsevier; 2021. p. 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824463-0.00001-X
  3. Saravanan A, Senthil Kumar P, Jeevanantham S, Karishma S, Tajsabreen B, Yaashikaa PR, et al. Effective water/wastewater treatment methodologies for toxic pollutants removal: Processes and applications towards sustainable development. Chemosphere. 2021;280:130595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130595 PMid:33940449
  4. Bhatia SK, Mehariya S, Bhatia RK, Kumar M, Pugazhendhi A, Awasthi MK, et al. Wastewater based microalgal biorefinery for bioenergy production: Progress and challenges. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;751:141599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141599 PMid:32890799
  5. Azanaw A, Birlie B, Teshome B, Jemberie M. Textile effluent treatment methods and eco-friendly resolution of textile wastewater. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering. 2022;6:100230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100230
  6. Mohapatra D, Brar S, Tyagi R, Surampalli R. Physico-chemical pre-treatment and biotransformation of wastewater and wastewater Sludge-Fate of bisphenol A. Chemosphere. 2010;78(8):923-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.053 PMid:20083294
  7. Shojaei S, Shojaei S. Chapter 23 - Optimization of Process Conditions in Wastewater Degradation Process. In: Karri RR, Ravindran G, Dehghani MH, editors. Soft Computing Techniques in Solid Waste and Wastewater Management: Elsevier; 2021. p. 381-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824463-0.00010-0
  8. Bulca Ö, Palas B, Atalay S, Ersöz G. Performance investigation of the hybrid methods of adsorption or catalytic wet air oxidation subsequent to electrocoagulation in treatment of real textile wastewater and kinetic modelling. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2021;40:101821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101821
  9. Arsene D, Musteret CP, Catrinescu C, Apopei P, Barjoveanu G, Teodosiu C. Combined oxidation and ultrafiltration processes for the removal of priority organic pollutants from wastewaters. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal (EEMJ). 2011;10(12). https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2011.261
  10. Epelle EI, Macfarlane A, Cusack M, Burns A, Okolie JA, Mackay W, et al. Ozone application in different industries: A review of recent developments. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2023;454:140188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140188 PMid:36373160 PMCid:PMC9637394
  11. Broséus R, Vincent S, Aboulfadl K, Daneshvar A, Sauvé S, Barbeau B, et al. Ozone oxidation of pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors and pesticides during drinking water treatment. Water research. 2009;43(18):4707-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.031 PMid:19695660
  12. Joseph CG, Farm YY, Taufiq-Yap YH, Pang CK, Nga JLH, Li Puma G. Ozonation treatment processes for the remediation of detergent wastewater: A comprehensive review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2021;9(5):106099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106099
  13. Sgroi M, Anumol T, Vagliasindi FGA, Snyder SA, Roccaro P. Comparison of the new Cl2/O3/UV process with different ozone- and UV-based AOPs for wastewater treatment at pilot scale: Removal of pharmaceuticals and changes in fluorescing organic matter. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;765:142720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142720 PMid:33572038
  14. Deborde M, Rabouan S, Duguet J-P, Legube B. Kinetics of aqueous ozone-induced oxidation of some endocrine disruptors. Environmental science & technology. 2005;39(16):6086-92. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0501619 PMid:16173567
  15. Deborde M, Rabouan S, Mazellier P, Duguet J-P, Legube B. Oxidation of bisphenol A by ozone in aqueous solution. Water research. 2008;42(16):4299-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.07.015 PMid:18752822
  16. Przydacz A, Bojanowski J, Albrecht A, Albrecht Ł. Hydroxyl-group-activated azomethine ylides in organocatalytic H-bond-assisted 1, 3-dipolar cycloadditions and beyond. Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry. 2021;19(14):3075-86. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0OB02380A PMid:33885562
  17. Chen H, Wang J. Degradation and mineralization of ofloxacin by ozonation and peroxone (O3/H2O2) process. Chemosphere. 2021;269:128775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128775 PMid:33162160
  18. Wang J, Chen H. Catalytic ozonation for water and wastewater treatment: Recent advances and perspective. Science of the Total Environment. 2020;704:135249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135249 PMid:31837842
  19. Xiong X, Wang B, Zhu W, Tian K, Zhang H. A review on ultrasonic catalytic microbubbles ozonation processes: properties, hydroxyl radicals generation pathway and potential in application. Catalysts. 2018;9(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9010010
  20. Shams Khoramabadi G, Godini H. The efficiency of advanced oxidation process UV/H 2 O 2 in remove the antibiotic ceftriaxone in the aquatic environment. Lorestan University of Medical Sciences Journal. 2014;16(1):59.
  21. Hayat K, Gondal M, Khaled MM, Ahmed S. Effect of operational key parameters on photocatalytic degradation of phenol using nano nickel oxide synthesized by sol-gel method. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 2011;336(1-2):64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2010.12.011
  22. Parastar S, POURESHGH Y, Nasseri S, Vosoughi M, Golestanifar H, Hemmati S, et al. Photocatalytic removal of nitrate from aqueous solutions by ZnO/UV process. 2012.
  23. Liu H, Wang C, Wang G. Photocatalytic advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: recent advances and perspective. Chemistry-An Asian Journal. 2020;15(20):3239-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202000895 PMid:32860468
  24. Khan S, Naushad M, Al-Gheethi A, Iqbal J. Engineered nanoparticles for removal of pollutants from wastewater: Current status and future prospects of nanotechnology for remediation strategies. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2021;9(5):106160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106160
  25. Domingues E, Fernandes E, Gomes J, Martins RC. Advanced oxidation processes perspective regarding swine wastewater treatment. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;776:145958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145958
  26. Terna AD, Elemike EE, Mbonu JI, Osafile OE, Ezeani RO. The future of semiconductors nanoparticles: Synthesis, properties and applications. Materials Science and Engineering: B. 2021;272:115363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2021.115363
  27. Sharma M, Sondhi H, Krishna R, Srivastava SK, Rajput P, Nigam S, et al. Assessment of GO/ZnO nanocomposite for solar-assisted photocatalytic degradation of industrial dye and textile effluent. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27:32076-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08849-3 PMid:32506402
  28. Firouzeh N, Malakootian M, Asadzadeh SN, Khatami M, Makarem Z. Degradation of ciprofloxacin using ultrasound/ZnO/oxone process from aqueous solution-lab-scale analysis and optimization. BioNanoScience. 2021;11:306-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-021-00838-1
  29. Chavoshan S, Khodadadi M, Nasseh N. Photocatalytic degradation of penicillin G from simulated wastewater using the UV/ZnO process: isotherm and kinetic study. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2020;18:107-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00442-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00465-0
  30. Huong PTL, Van Quang N, Huyen NT, Huong HT, Tuan DA, Tran MT, et al. Efficiency enhancement of photocatalytic activity under UV and visible light irradiation using ZnO/Fe3O4 heteronanostructures. Solar Energy. 2023;249:712-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.12.011
  31. Fernández L, Gamallo M, González-Gómez M, Vázquez-Vázquez C, Rivas J, Pintado M, et al. Insight into antibiotics removal: Exploring the photocatalytic performance of a Fe3O4/ZnO nanocomposite in a novel magnetic sequential batch reactor. Journal of environmental management. 2019;237:595-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.089 PMid:30826641
  32. Raha S, Ahmaruzzaman M. Enhanced performance of a novel superparamagnetic g-C3N4/NiO/ZnO/Fe3O4 nanohybrid photocatalyst for removal of esomeprazole: Effects of reaction parameters, co-existing substances and water matrices. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020;395:124969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124969
  33. Bruchet M, Mendelson NL, Melman A. Photochemical patterning of ionically cross-linked hydrogels. Processes. 2013;1(2):153-66. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr1020153
  34. Moussavi G, Mahmoudi M. Degradation and biodegradability improvement of the reactive red 198 azo dye using catalytic ozonation with MgO nanocrystals. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2009;152(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.03.014
  35. Le-Clech P, Lee E-K, Chen V. Hybrid photocatalysis/membrane treatment for surface waters containing low concentrations of natural organic matters. Water Research. 2006;40(2):323-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.11.011 PMid:16378634
  36. Handbook E. Advanced Photochemical Oxidation Processes. Office of Research and Development Washington, DC. 1998;20460.
  37. Ahmadi M, Rahmani H, Takdastan A, Jaafarzadeh N, Mostoufi A. A novel catalytic process for degradation of bisphenol A from aqueous solutions: a synergistic effect of nano-Fe3O4@ Alg-Fe on O3/H2O2. Process safety and environmental protection. 2016;104:413-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.09.008
  38. Deepty M, Srinivas C, Kumar ER, Mohan NK, Prajapat C, Rao TC, et al. XRD, EDX, FTIR and ESR spectroscopic studies of co-precipitated Mn-substituted Zn-ferrite nanoparticles. Ceramics International. 2019;45(6):8037-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.01.029
  39. Sebayang K, Taslima S, Ginting M, Sebayang P, Bukit N. Cr-DOPED ZnO Prepared by Solid State Reaction Method.
  40. Hamouda RA, Salman AS, Alharbi AA, Alhasani RH, Elshamy MM. Assessment of the antigenotoxic effects of alginate and zno/alginate-nanocomposites extracted from brown alga Fucus vesiculosus in Mice. Polymers. 2021;13(21):3839. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213839 PMid:34771394 PMCid:PMC8587912
  41. Jahantigh A, Kamani H, Norabadi E, Bazrafshan E, Sancholi F, Meshkinian A. Efficiency evaluation of photocatalytic process using ZnO nano catalyst for removal of 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol by response surface methodology. Journal of Research in Environmental Health. 2019;5(3):205-16.
  42. Chankhanittha T, Nanan S. Visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of ofloxacin (OFL) antibiotic and Rhodamine B (RhB) dye by solvothermally grown ZnO/Bi2MoO6 heterojunction. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2021;582:412-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.08.061 PMid:32866808
  43. Farzadkia M, Bazrafshan E, Esrafili A, Yang J-K, Shirzad-Siboni M. Photocatalytic degradation of Metronidazole with illuminated TiO 2 nanoparticles. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering. 2015;13:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-015-0194-y PMid:25908992 PMCid:PMC4407879
  44. Kalikeri S, Kamath N, Gadgil DJ, Shetty Kodialbail V. Visible light-induced photocatalytic degradation of Reactive Blue-19 over highly efficient polyaniline-TiO 2 nanocomposite: a comparative study with solar and UV photocatalysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2018;25:3731-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0663-1 PMid:29168135
  45. Hansen K, Andersen HR. Energy effectiveness of direct UV and UV/H2O2 treatment of estrogenic chemicals in biologically treated sewage. International Journal of Photoenergy. 2012;2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/270320
  46. Liu F, Yi P, Wang X, Gao H, Zhang H. Degradation of Acid Orange 7 by an ultrasound/ZnO-GAC/persulfate process. Separation and Purification Technology.194(Supplement C):181-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.10.072
  47. Benhebal H, Chaib M, Salmon T, Geens J, Leonard A, Lambert SD, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of phenol and benzoic acid using zinc oxide powders prepared by the sol-gel process. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 2013;52(3):517-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.04.005
  48. Kermani M, Kakavandi B, Farzadkia M, Esrafili A, Jokandan SF, Shahsavani A. Catalytic ozonation of high concentrations of catechol over TiO2@ Fe3O4 magnetic core-shell nanocatalyst: Optimization, toxicity and degradation pathway studies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;192:597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.274
  49. Meng F, Ma W, Zong P, Wang R, Wang L, Duan C, et al. Synthesis of a novel catalyst based on Fe (II)/Fe (III) oxide and high alumina coal fly ash for the degradation of o-methyl phenol. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;133:986-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.094
  50. Zhu M, Wang H, Keller AA, Wang T, Li F. The effect of humic acid on the aggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles under different pH and ionic strengths. Science of the Total Environment. 2014;487:375-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.036 PMid:24793841
  51. Areerachakul N, Sakulkhaemaruethai S, Johir M, Kandasamy J, Vigneswaran S. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants from wastewater using aluminium doped titanium dioxide. Journal of water process engineering. 2019;27:177-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.12.006
  52. Tang T, Lu G, Wang W, Wang R, Huang K, Qiu Z, et al. Photocatalytic removal of organic phosphate esters by TiO2: Effect of inorganic ions and humic acid. Chemosphere. 2018;206:26-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.161 PMid:29723749
  53. El-Kemary M, El-Shamy H, El-Mehasseb I. Photocatalytic degradation of ciprofloxacin drug in water using ZnO nanoparticles. Journal of Luminescence. 2010;130(12):2327-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2010.07.013
  54. Asgari E, Sheikhmohammadi A, Manshouri M, Hashemzadeh B. The investigation of removal performances of UV/ZnO, UV/ZnO/H2O2 and UV/ZnO/O3 processes in the degradation of Butoben and Phenylmethyl ester from aqueous solution. Optik. 2021;228:166208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.166208.
  55. Moussavi SP, Emamjomeh MM, Ehrampoush MH, Dehvari M, Jamshidi S. Removal of Acid Orange 7 Dye from Synthetic Textile Wastewater by Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Adsorption Studies, Isotherms and Kinetics. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences.12(11):907-18. (Persian)