تعهد نامه

نوع مقاله : مقالات پژوهشى اصیل کمی و کیفی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس محیط زیست شرکت توسعه آهن و فولاد گل‌گهر، سیرجان، ایران

2 مدیر سلامت، ایمنی و محیط زیست شرکت توسعه آهن و فولاد گل‌گهر، سیرجان، ایران (کارشناس ارشد مهندسی شیمی )

3 رئیس ایمنی فنی و فرآیند شرکت توسعه آهن و فولاد گل‌گهر، سیرجان، ایران (کارشناس ارشد HSE )

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: در ایران صنعت فولاد به لحاظ وجود منابع معدنی مورد نیاز در کشور، توانمندی نیروی انسانی، وجود بسترهای اقتصادی و اثربخشی تولید فولاد در رشد اقتصادی کشور، از اهمیت ویژه ای برخوردار است. بنـابراین بایـد راهکارهایی اتخاذ گردد که ضمن کاهش خطرات محیط زیستی، صنعت فولاد به سمت توسعه پایدار پیش رود. هـدف از پژوهش حاضر ارزیابی و مدیریت ریسک محیط زیستی کارخانه احیای مستقیم به روش EFMEA در شرکت توسعه آهن و فولاد گل گهر می باشد. 

مواد و روش ها: در ابتدا با بازدید میدانی تمامی خطرات و جنبه‌های محیط زیستی شناسـایی و بـا استفاده از روشEFMEA ارزیابی شد. RPN با حاصل ضرب احتمال، شدت و بازیافت یا گستره آلودگی به دست آمده است. در نهایت RPN ثانویه پس از تعریف و اعمال اقدامات کنترلی پیشنهادی محاسبه گردید.

یافته ها: در این پژوهش 468 جنبه ریسک محیط زیستی شناسایی شد که از این میزان 258 ریسک در سطح ناچیز، 187 ریسـک در سطح کم، 17 ریسک در سطح متوسط و 6 ریسک در سطح بالا قرار داشتند.

نتیجه گیری: نتایج نشان داد که مهمترین ریسک های موجود در واحد تولید بوده که بیشترین عدد ریسک مربوط به گازهای خروجی دودکش از جنبه انتشار گازهای گلخانه ای می باشد. پس از ارزیابی ثانویه و انجام اقدامات اصلاحی، مشخص گردید که استفاده از روش های مناسب مدیریت ریسک های محیط زیستی، برنامه ریزی صحیح، ارائه راهکارهای پیشگیرانه و اصلاحی می‌تواند از وقوع پیامدهای محیط زیستی جلوگیری و خطرات محیط زیستی ناشی از صنایع را به میزان قابل توجهی کاهش دهد. 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation and Management of the Environmental Risks of the Direct Recovery Plant of Sponge Iron Production Using the EFMEA Method (Case Study: Golgohar Iron and Steel Development Company )

نویسندگان [English]

  • barzin behroj 1
  • hadi zahedi 1
  • Bahram kalantari 2
  • Mohamadhossein Lohrasb 3

1 Environmental expert of Gol Gohar Iron and Steel Development Company, Sirjan, Iran

2 Health, safety and environment manager of Gol Gohar Iron and Steel Development Company, Sirjan, Iran (M.s Chemical Engineering)

3 Head of technical and process safety of Gol Gohar Iron and Steel Development Company, Sirjan, Iran (M.s Health Safety and Environment)

چکیده [English]

Background and Objective: The steel industry is highly crucial in Iran due to the availability of mineral resources, manpower capacity, economic platforms, and the effectiveness of steel manufacturing in Iran's economic growth. Therefore, some strategies must be taken to reduce environmental hazards and direct the steel industry toward sustainable development. This study aims to evaluate and manage the environmental risk of a direct recovery plant based on the EFMEA method in Golgohar Iron and Steel Development Company. 

Materials and Methods: All environmental aspects and hazards were identified through field visits and analyzed using the EFMEA method. RPN was measured by probability coefficient, intensity, and recovery or extent of pollution. Ultimately, secondary RPN was measured after defining and applying the control measures.

Results: This study identified 468 aspects of environmental risks among which, 258 risks were at a minor level, 187 risks were low-level, 17 risks were medium-level, and six risks were high-level. 

Conclusion: the results confirmed that the most substantial risks occurred in the production unit, with the highest risk number related to chimney exhaust gases in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. After secondary assessment and corrective measures were done, it was found that proper methods adopted for environmental risk management, accurate planning, and presentation of preventive and corrective strategies can significantly reduce the environmental consequences and environmental hazards caused by industries. 
 
Open Access Policy: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sponge Iron
  • Risk Management
  • Recovery Plant
  • EFMEA
  • Environmental Aspects
  • Golgohar
  1. Ramezani-Mooziraji M, Sabour M, Dezvareh G, and Ehteshami M. Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Production and Its Environmental Impacts. HSR 2023; 19 (1):85-94. .URL: http://hsr.mui.ac.ir/article-1-1357-fa.html.
  2. Midrex Technologies. World Direct Reduction Statistics (Online). 2022. URL: https://www.midrex.com/wp-content/uploads/Midrex-STATSbook2022Final.pdf.
  3. Balist J, Mohammadi B, Chehrzar F, Bahram MM, Yasser M. Environmental Risk Assessment of Gachsaran Oil Refinery Production Unit by Integrating Multi Criteria Decision Making and Environmental Failure-Mode and Effects Analysis. J Environ Sci Technol 2018; 1( 20). (Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jest.2018.12588.
  4. Hayaty M, Rahmati M. Environmental risk assessment of the Eastern Alborz coal mine factory using taxonomic analysis method. J Miner Res Eng 2017; 3(2): 67-79. (Persian). https://doi.org/10.30479/jmre.2017.1270
  5. Meatr F, Mosavi K, Lahijanian A. Assessment and management of environmental risk in steel factories (General affiliated to iron and steel company of Ghadir Iranians). First National Conference on Environmental Conservation and Planning. Mar 2012. (Persian).
  6. Kgoudarzi K, Bahrani M, Hooshyar H. Energy and Exergy Development of Steel Plant: Especially Yasuj Industry. J Eng Manage Energy 2015; 3 (5): 60-9. (Persian). http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJEX.2018.10014412.
  7. Jahany M. Investigating the methods of steel fabrication and production and control methods and reducing the environmental impacts caused by them. J Department of Mineral Processing 2011. (Persian).
  8. Heidari M, Rezayan S, Nezakati R. Environmental risk evaluation of the exploitation of the lake in twenty second region of Tehran by using MADM multi criteria decision. J Mar Sci Technol Res 2015; 1(10). (Persian).
  9. Habibinia H, Dashti S. Environment, Health and Safety Risk Assessment in Industrial Sector of Salman Farsi Agro-Industrial Company Using Delphi Technique and FMEA & TOPSIS Integrated Model. J Environ Sci Technol 2018;1(20). (Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jest.2018.12586.
  10. Jafari Azar S, Sabzghabaei G, Tavakoli M, Dashti SS. Assessing and analyzing the environmental risks of Khakhoroun wetland by using multi-criteria decision making methods. Iranian J Appl Ecol 2017(40): 75-63. (Persian). https://doi.org/10.22055/jise.2017.13262.
  11. Mosavi K. Evaluating the Environmental Condition of the Cities Adjacent to Steel Industries using SWOT Model (Case Study: Ardakan City). Sustainability Dev Environ 2016;4(3). (Persian). https://www.magiran.com/p1690831.
  12. Frasad M. Environmental, Health, and Safety Assessment of Lavan Oil Field Using Hibisin Network and Effmea Method: Isfahan University of Technology; 2012.
  13. Bakooie Katrini M, Haji Mirzahosseini A, NasrAbadi N. Hazards identification and risk evaluation through FMEA method in Tehran district girls and boys publik primary schools. J Environ Sci Technol 2018;20(1). (Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jest.2018.12587.
  14. Ghaderi S, Rahimi A, Hedayatifar M, Arab Najafi SM. Environmental risk management and assessment of Tehran urban & suburban metro by using EFMEA method (case study: Sadeghieh terminal). J Environ Sci Technol 2015;2(7). (Persian). https://www.magiran.com/p1426407.
  15. Lotfolahzadeh A, Miri Lavasani M, Dehghani A. Risk Assessment and Determination of Insurance Rate by FMEA Method- Case Study in a cement Factory. J Occup Environ Health 2017;2(4): 311-22. (Persian).
  16. Rezaiean S, Mujahedi M, Jozi S. Evaluation of environmental risk of Polystyrene unit of Tabriz petrochemical company using JSA and EFMEA comparative method. J Environ Sci Technol 2016. (Persian).
  17. Sang T, Jian Y, Li M,  Feng L,  Jie Z, Quan Ch, Lei X. A study on solving the production process problems of the photovoltaic cell industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018; 82(3): 3546-3553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.105.
  18. AmanatYazdi L. Environmental risk management of air pollution in the central warehouse of Yazd oil distribution company and the zoning of air pollution using GIS. Environ Res 2015; 9 (5): 103-104. (Persian). https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20089597.1393.5.9.10.3.
  19. Danielsson, M. & Gunnarsson, S. Guideline for Implementation of environment failure mode and effects analysis method. marmait publish 2001. Sofia, Bulgaria. 127pp.