Document Type : Research article
Authors
1 Ph.D Candidate, Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Khajeh Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environment, Water and Wastewater of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Process design, Faculty of chemical Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
Abstract
Today, plastics have a special place among the various issues that are considered as sources of pollution. Most of these plastics are in the dimensions of Micro and Nano. One of the most important sources of Microplastics transfer is wastewater treatment plants, where a large amount of these particles, which are not removed in the treatment process, enter the receiving environment. The purpose of this study is to first determine the optimal method of identifying and extracting particles from wastewater for counting and then to investigate the amount of removal and also to determine the amount of particles leaving the treatment plant.
Sampling of inlet and outlet of wastewater treatment plant located in Mazandaran province was done seasonally in three seasons of spring, summer and autumn to determine in which season of the year, the amount of microplastics in wastewater increases or decreases. Also, the extraction and identification method is based on acid washing operation and based on creating a density difference, which has resulted in a favorable result with optimization and innovation.
Using this method, the amount of Microparticles and microfibers along with the size and shape of the particle was determined and it was determined to what extent the normal treatment process is able to separate Microplastics from wastewater. The treatment plant can remove an average of 95% of the particles, which means that the remaining 5% of the particles are removed with the effluent and enter the aqueous environment.
Finally, it was found that the determined laboratory method can identify and extract Microplastics in very small sizes to a very desirable extent. Also, determining the appropriate parameters of liquid volume, salt consumption and the use of dual capacity iron increased the efficiency compared to other methods and led to the identification of smaller particles than previous research.
Keywords
- Gourmelon G. Global plastic production rises, recycling lags. Vital Signs. 2015;22:91-5.
- Free CM, Jensen OP, Mason SA, Eriksen M, Williamson NJ, Boldgiv B. High-levels of microplastic pollution in a large, remote, mountain lake. Marine pollution bulletin. 2014;85(1):156-63.
- Rochman CM, Kross SM, Armstrong JB, Bogan MT, Darling ES, Green SJ, et al. Scientific evidence supports a ban on microbeads. ACS Publications; 2015.
- Carr SA, Liu J, Tesoro AG. Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water research. 2016;91:174-82.
- Darvish G. Ehteshami M. Mehrdadi N. et al. Study and study of environmental effects of microplastic particles and its identification. Third National Conference on Environmental Management and Engineering 1400 (persian)
- Estahbanati S, Fahrenfeld NL. Influence of wastewater treatment plant discharges on microplastic concentrations in surface water. Chemosphere. 2016;162:277-84.
- Galloway TS, Cole M, Lewis C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nature ecology & evolution. 2017;1(5):1-8.
- Brennecke D, Duarte B, Paiva F, Caçador I, Canning-Clode J. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2016;178:189-95.
- Viršek MK, Palatinus A, Koren Š, Peterlin M, Horvat P, Kržan A. Protocol for microplastics sampling on the sea surface and sample analysis. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments). 2016(118):e55161.
- Chae Y, An Y-J. Effects of micro-and nanoplastics on aquatic ecosystems: Current research trends and perspectives. Marine pollution bulletin. 2017;124(2):624-32.
- Talvitie J, Mikola A, Koistinen A, Setälä O. Solutions to microplastic pollution–Removal of microplastics from wastewater effluent with advanced wastewater treatment technologies. Water research. 2017;123:401-7.
- Corami F, Rosso B, Bravo B, Gambaro A, Barbante C. A novel method for purification, quantitative analysis and characterization of microplastic fibers using Micro-FTIR. Chemosphere. 2020;238:124564.
- Thiele CJ, Hudson MD, Russell AE. Evaluation of existing methods to extract microplastics from bivalve tissue: Adapted KOH digestion protocol improves filtration at single-digit pore size. Marine pollution bulletin. 2019;142:384-93.
- Raju S, Carbery M, Kuttykattil A, Senthirajah K, Lundmark A, Rogers Z, et al. Improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant. Water research. 2020;173:115549.
- Liu X, Yuan W, Di M, Li Z, Wang J. Transfer and fate of microplastics during the conventional activated sludge process in one wastewater treatment plant of China. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2019;362:176-82.
- Murphy F, Ewins C, Carbonnier F, Quinn B. Wastewater treatment works (WwTW) as a source of microplastics in the aquatic environment. Environmental science & technology. 2016;50(11):5800-8.
- Oladejo A. Analysis of microplastics and their removal from water. 2017.
- Covernton GA, Pearce CM, Gurney-Smith HJ, Chastain SG, Ross PS, Dower JF, et al. Size and shape matter: A preliminary analysis of microplastic sampling technique in seawater studies with implications for ecological risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment. 2019;667:124-32.
- Mintenig S, Int-Veen I, Löder MG, Primpke S, Gerdts G. Identification of microplastic in effluents of waste water treatment plants using focal plane array-based micro-Fourier-transform infrared imaging. Water research. 2017;108:365-72.
- Bayo J, Olmos S, López-Castellanos J. Microplastics in an urban wastewater treatment plant: The influence of physicochemical parameters and environmental factors. Chemosphere. 2020;238:124593.
- Magnusson K, Eliaeson K, Fråne A, Haikonen K, Olshammar M, Stadmark J, et al. Swedish sources and pathways for microplastics to the marine environment. IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet; 2016.
- Magni S, Binelli A, Pittura L, Avio CG, Della Torre C, Parenti CC, et al. The fate of microplastics in an Italian Wastewater Treatment Plant. Science of the total environment. 2019;652:602-10.
- Sun J, Dai X, Wang Q, van Loosdrecht MC, Ni B-J. Microplastics in wastewater treatment plants: Detection, occurrence and removal. Water research. 2019;152:21-37.
- Prata JC. Microplastics in wastewater: State of the knowledge on sources, fate and solutions. Marine pollution bulletin. 2018;129(1):262-5.
- Gies EA, LeNoble JL, Noël M, Etemadifar A, Bishay F, Hall ER, et al. Retention of microplastics in a major secondary wastewater treatment plant in Vancouver, Canada. Marine pollution bulletin. 2018;133:553-61.
- Edo C, González-Pleiter M, Leganés F, Fernández-Piñas F, Rosal R. Fate of microplastics in wastewater treatment plants and their environmental dispersion with effluent and sludge. Environmental Pollution. 2020;259:113837.
- Ziajahromi S, Neale PA, Rintoul L, Leusch FD. Wastewater treatment plants as a pathway for microplastics: development of a new approach to sample wastewater-based microplastics. Water research. 2017;112:93-9.
- 28. Masura J, Baker J, Foster G, Arthur C. Laboratory Methods for the Analysis of Microplastics in the Marine Environment: Recommendations for quantifying synthetic particles in waters and sediments. 2015.
)