Document Type : Research article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Water Sciences and Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

The present study stimulated the groundwater quality parameters of Zeidoun plain including Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR), Electrical Conductivity (EC), Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), using ANN and ANN-GA models and in the end compare their results with measured data. The input data for TDS quality parameter consist of Na, EC, Ca, Mg, SO4 and SAR, for SAR including the Na, TDS, Hco3, Ca and Mg and quality parameter of EC contains Ca, Mg, SO4, Na and SAR, gathered from 2011 to 2018.
The results showed that in ANN and ANN-GA models, the highest accuracy of SAR simulation in the model with sigmoid tangent function, in EC simulator model, the highest accuracy in ANN and ANN-GA models, respectively, related to logarithm stimulus functions. Sigmoid and tangent is sigmoid. Also in ANN and ANN-GA models, the highest accuracy of TDS simulation was obtained in the model with sigmoid tangent stimulus and sigmoid logarithm, respectively. so that the MAE and RMSE statistics have the minimum and R^2 has the maximum value for the model. In general, according to the obtained results, the accuracy of ANN-GA model is higher than ANN model, to simulate the groundwater quality parameters of Zeidoun plain.
Therefore, the use of artificial neural network model along with genetic algorithm is a good tool to simulate high quality groundwater quality parameters, without the need for measurement and laboratory work, which requires high time and cost.

Keywords

  1. Mirzaei A.A, Nazemi A.H. Predicting groundwater level using artificial neural networks. First National Conference on Coastal Land Water Resources Management, Sari, University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari. 2009 (In Persian).
  2. Dehghani A.A, Asgari M, Mosaedi A. Comparison of three methods of artificial neural network, fuzzy inference system, adaptive neural system and geostatistics among groundwater level detection (Case study of Qazvin plain). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. 2008; 16 (1): 517-528 (In Persian).
  3. Daryaee M, Eigder Nejad A, Bina M, Radmanesh F. Effect of river water quality factors on EC and TDS using artificial neural networks. 8th Seminar on River Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. 2010 (In Persian).
  4. Luk KC, Ball J.E, Sharma A. An application of artificial neural network for rainfall forecasting. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 2001; 33 (6-7): 683-693.
  5. Sayadi Shahraki A, Soltani Mohammadi A, Naseri A.A. and Mokhtaran A. Simulation of groundwater salinity using Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and model SEAWAT (Case study: Debal khazaie sugarcane plantation). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation. 2017; 23(5), 307-316 (In Persian).
  6. Rooki R, Ariyafar A, Adeli Nasab J. Investigation of groundwater quality in Gonabad plain aquifer of Khorasan Razavi using multivariate statistical methods and artificial intelligence. Journal of Mineral Resources Engineering. 2017; 2 (1): 49-61(In Persian).
  7. Kanda E.K, Kipkorir E.C, Kosgei J.R. Dissolved oxygen modelling using artificial neural network: a case of river nzoia, lake victoria basin, kenya. Journal of Water Security. 2016; 2 (1): 1-7.
  8. Montaseri M, Ghavidel S.Z, Sanikhani H. Water quality variations in different climates of Iran: toward modeling total dissolved solid using soft computing techniques. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,. 2018; 32 (8): 2253-2273.
  9. Dayhoff J.E. Neural Network Principles. Prentice-Hall International, U.S.A. 1990.
  10. Khanna T. Foundation of neural networks. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, U.S.A. 1990.
  11. Goldberg D.E. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Addison-Wesley. 1989.
  12. Musavi-Jahromi S.H, Golabi M. Application of artificial neural networks in the river water quality modeling: Karoon river, Journal of Applied Sciences. 2008; 8 (12): 2324-2328.
  13. Banejad H, Kamali M, Amirmoradi K, Olyaie F. Forecasting Some of the Qualitative Parameters of Rivers Using Wavelet Artificial Neural Network Hybrid (W-ANN) Model (Case of study: Jajroud River of Tehran and Gharaso River of Kermanshah). Journal Health & Environ. 2013; 6(3), 277-294 (In Persian).
  14. Soltani Mohammadi A, Sayadi Shahraki A, Naseri A.A. Simulation of Groundwater Quality Parameters Using ANN and ANN+PSO Models (Case Study: Ramhormoz Plain). Journal of Pollution. 2016; 3(2), 191-200.
  15. Hill M. Methods and guidelines for effective model calibration. U.S. Geological survey Water- Resources Investigations Rep. 1998; 98-4005.
  16. Ahaninjan K, Egdernezhad A. Modeling Qualitative Parameters of SAR, EC, and TDS in Groundwater using Optimized Artificial Neural Network Model (Case Study: Behbahan Plain). Journal of Environment and Water Engineering. 2020; 6(2), 161-172 (In Persian).
  17. Rezaee M.J, Rezaee M.R, Rezaee J. Estimation of Groundwater Level Changes Using Four Different Evolutionary Neural Network Techniques, Case Study: Dasht-e Abbas, Ilam Province. Journal of Watershed Engineering and Management. 2020; 12 (3): 737-755 (In Persian).
  18. Jalalkamali A, Jalalkamali N. Groundwater modeling using hybrid of artificial neural network with genetic algorithm. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2017; 6 (26): 5775-5784.
  19. Dash N.B, Panda S.N, Remesan R, Sahoo N. Hybrid neural modeling for groundwater level prediction. Neural Computing and Applications. 2010; 19(8): 1251-1263.