Sahar Zamaniahari; Moradali Zareipour
Abstract
The supervision of food preparation, distribution, and supply centers to maintain the health of users is the responsibility of inspectors and environmental health experts of medical universities across the country. Proper inspection and control of these centers play an important role in preventing the ...
Read More
The supervision of food preparation, distribution, and supply centers to maintain the health of users is the responsibility of inspectors and environmental health experts of medical universities across the country. Proper inspection and control of these centers play an important role in preventing the occurrence and prevalence of infectious diseases and protect the health of people in the community. Therefore, to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and the increasing number of patients with this disease, stricter control measures should be applied to food preparation, distribution, and supply centers, and health protocols should be inspected in these centers. Due to the shortage of environmental health forces, as well as the expansion of food preparation, distribution, and supply centers, the inspection of these centers and training of people in all centers regarding the observance of coronavirus prevention protocols are not possible. Therefore, the authors in this article suggest health volunteers as participants in overseeing food preparation, distribution, and supply centers. The active involvement and participation of health volunteers increase the sense of social responsibility and eliminate the sense of authority and dominance of formal organizations. After receiving face-to-face and virtual training on coronavirus prevention health protocols in food preparation, distribution, and supply centers, and visiting and monitoring several food centers alongside environmental health experts, health volunteers can carry out their activities for disease prevention and control. In this way, there will be a comprehensive determination to control the coronavirus in centers for the preparation, distribution, and supply of food. The results of these activities will have a positive effect on the health of people and society and ultimately the control of the disease.
Rasoul Alinezhad; Mehdi Yousefi; Hossein Ebrahimipour; Ali Taghipour; Amin Mohammadi
Abstract
Background and purpose: One of the most important relations between reducing organizational costs and maintaining the quality of services provided is the use of appropriate models for managing staff performance; Using these models can increase employee productivity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate ...
Read More
Background and purpose: One of the most important relations between reducing organizational costs and maintaining the quality of services provided is the use of appropriate models for managing staff performance; Using these models can increase employee productivity. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the volume of environmental health activities in health centers. Materials and methods: This study was a descriptive and applied study that was done in both quantitative and qualitative dimensions. The pilot design of the model was carried out at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Every 10 minutes was considered a unit of work. Results: 51 fields of activity were identified in the field of environmental health activities. The total number of units in the field of environmental health was calculated to be 1019 units. Out of the identified activities, the most frequent repetitions were conduct inspection and recorded in the system, followed by daily chlorometry with 100 and 84 repetitions, respectively. Conclusion: Personnel in any organization need a decisive mechanism to reduce inequality and a model of value for the amount of work that one does to improve productivity, increase efficiency, work motivation, and reduce inappropriate psychological stimuli in the workplace. This will be achieved using models such as the model presented in this study.
Javad Torkashvand; Mahdi Farzadkia; Ahmad Jonidi Jafari; Mohsen Heidari; Ahmad Ghalkhanbaz
Abstract
Background and Aims: There are various methods for the disinfection of infectious wastes which are of great importance due to their potential health and environmental risks and there are different insights about their management in Iran. Hence, the aim of this study was to survey the various aspects ...
Read More
Background and Aims: There are various methods for the disinfection of infectious wastes which are of great importance due to their potential health and environmental risks and there are different insights about their management in Iran. Hence, the aim of this study was to survey the various aspects of disinfection methods of infectious waste on the basis of environmental health specialist insights. Material and Methods: For performing this study, a questionnaire was prepared and the opinions of the specialists were gathered about five disinfection and disposal methods of infectious wastes, and finally the data were analyzed. Moreover, the preferences of the specialists for selecting each method were also asked based on 9 various aspects. Results: It was found that health issues received the highest priority (with 26% of desirability) from the specialists in selecting the method, while the lowest priority was assigned for financial issues (with 8% of desirability) and political acceptability (with 6% of desirability). Environmental health specialists believed that autoclaving and waste incinerating with 77.8% and 44.1% of desirability, respectively, are the most favorable and undesirable methods for disinfecting the infectious wastes. The results showed that the disinfection is a top priority for the specialists, and, with respect to current situation, they did not make any significant difference between on-site and ex-situ disinfecting methods, which is reflected in the scores of 3.65 and 3.72 for these two scenarios. Conclusion: Overall, health aspects have the most important priority in the management of infectious wastes. Therefore, autoclaving and microwaving are the most appropriate methods for the disinfection of such wastes. Landfilling and incineration were not suggested for the disposal or treatment of infectious wastes.